Our Website Uses Cookies
We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.
For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.
Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.
We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.
This page has been added to your binder.
Ashley Simonsen is a litigator whose practice focuses on defending complex class actions and antitrust litigation in state and federal court.
Ms. Simonsen has deep experience representing clients in the financial services, consumer brands, and sports industries. Before practicing law, Ms. Simonsen was an associate at Lehman Brothers in New York where she advised banks on balance sheet management and interest rate hedging strategies.
- Representation of loan servicing company in defense of putative “true lender” class actions in California federal court challenging interest rates and late fee charges, including under the California Unfair Competition Law (UCL). Won motions to dismiss two cases on federal preemption and statute of limitations grounds, and defeated certification of interest rate classes in another.
- Representation of state-chartered, FDIC-insured bank in defense of putative “true lender” class actions in California and other federal courts. Won motion to compel arbitration in California and obtained stipulation to arbitrate in another.
- Representation of loan servicing company in defense of putative nationwide class action in New York federal court challenging representations to borrowers, including under the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA).
- Representation of national banks in numerous consumer class actions in California federal court.
- Representation of professional sports franchise defending putative class actions challenging ticketing policies in state and federal courts in California, including under the UCL and federal antitrust laws. Secured dismissal of both cases at the pleading stage.
- Representation of snack food manufacturer in defense of putative class actions in California and New York federal court challenging alleged nonfunctional slack-fill in snack boxes, including under the UCL, CLRA, and California False Advertising Law (FAL). Won motion to dismiss New York case and defeated class certification in California case.
- Representation of dietary supplement company in defense of putative class actions in California state and federal courts challenging marketing and advertising of glucosamine supplements and other products under UCL, FAL, and CLRA.
- Representation of genomics company in defense of federal lawsuit alleging business torts and attempted monopolization.
- Representation of a Korean life sciences company and a Korean manufacturer of household products in defense of product liability action. Won two motions to quash for lack of personal jurisdiction.
- Representation of Uber Technologies, Inc. in negotiation of consent order with Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
- Representation of individual in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement action alleging securities fraud.
- Conducted internal investigation for corporate client.
- Representation of sports and entertainment company seeking third-party liability insurance coverage for a high-profile six-month trial. Settled on favorable grounds.
- Representation of clients in qui tam actions alleging violations of current good manufacturing practices (cGMPs), off-label promotion of prescription drugs and medical devices, and non-compliance with the Anti-Kickback Statute.
Pro Bono
- Representation of federal prisoner asserting claims for excessive force and deliberate indifference under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 before the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Argued appeal.
- Representation of individual in criminal case in Marin County Superior Court. Won motion to suppress evidence following cross-examination of arresting officer, resulting in dismissal of case by District Attorney.
- Representation of two California state prisoners sentenced under California’s Three Strikes law in state habeas and resentencing proceedings. Argued resentencing motions, conducted direct examination of expert, and secured vacatur of both sentences.
- Representation of Family Violence Appellate Project as amicus curiae in domestic violence victim’s appeal from decision denying renewal of restraining order before California Court of Appeal.
- Representation of a California state prisoner in petitioning for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court based on alleged violations of Due Process in state jury instructions.
Previous Experience
- Lehman Brothers, Analyst and Associate, New York, NY (2004-2007)
- Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Research Assistant, Boston, MA (2003)
Covington Promotes 20 New Partners
October 1, 2018
WASHINGTON—Covington has promoted 20 lawyers to its partnership. “This group covers a wide range of the firm’s most important practices and reflects the ongoing imperative of continuing to build and expand our strengths and to position the firm most effectively to be vibrant in the years ahead,” said Timothy Hester, Covington’s chair. "The size of our class is a ...
INSIGHT: The End of Stacked Actions—Implications Of the Supreme Court’s China Agritech Decision
July 13, 2018, Bloomberg Class Action Litigation Report
Practices
Education
Stanford Law School, J.D., 2010
- Stanford Law and Policy Review
Amherst College, B.A., 2004
- summa cum laude
- Phi Beta Kappa