Subscribe

  • How Can We Help You?

    Global Problem Solving from Covington: Deal with Complex Problems Anywhere in the World

Daniel L. Russell Jr.

Of Counsel

Washington +1 202 662 5420

  • About
  • Representative Matters
  • Credentials
  • About

    Dan Russell has extensive experience representing government contractors in complex, high-stakes litigation. He has litigated numerous “contractor on the battlefield” tort suits arising out of wartime incidents, as well as other tort and contract suits that implicate significant national defense interests. Dan is frequently called upon by clients to develop and assert an array of federal-law-based defenses, including the political question doctrine, federal preemption, the government contractor defense, and derivative sovereign immunity.

    Dan has litigated a variety of claims brought by or against the federal government, including: contract disputes before the Court of Federal Claims and the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals; claims against federal agencies brought under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Federal Tort Claims Act; and enforcement actions brought by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration. He has also litigated matters involving insurance coverage, environmental torts, the Civil False Claims Act, and international arbitration award enforcement under the New York Convention.

    Dan’s extensive appellate experience includes matters before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Third Circuit, Fourth Circuit, Fifth Circuit, Ninth Circuit, Eleventh Circuit, Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Areas of Expertise

  • Practices and Industries
  • Representative Matters
    • Defended U.S. military services contractor in a series of multimillion dollar wrongful death and personal injury suits brought by dozens of plaintiffs arising out of a suicide bomber attack at Bagram Airfield, a U.S. military base in Afghanistan. In one suit, following limited discovery, the district court granted a pre-answer motion to dismiss and held that the suit was non-justiciable based on the political question doctrine. See Loquasto v. Fluor Corp., Inc., 512 F. Supp. 3d 728 (N.D. Tex. 2021). In a separate suit, following limited discovery the district court granted a summary judgment motion and held that all tort claims were preempted based on the “combatant activities” exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act. See Hencely v. Fluor Corp., Case No. 6:19-cv-0048-BHH, 2021 WL 3568397 (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 2021). The district court also held that active duty soldiers lacked standing to sue for breach of contract because they were not intended beneficiaries of the government contract at issue, and thus the court granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings. See Hencely v. Fluor Corp., No. 6:19-00489-BHH, 2021 WL 3604781 (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2021).
    • Lead counsel for defense contractor in successful defense of tort suit arising out of Iranian ballistic missile attack on U.S. forces in Iraq. Following limited discovery, the court held that all claims were preempted based on the Defense Base Act (DBA) and the “combatant activities” exception to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). See Cloyd v. KBR, Inc., No. CV H-20-3714, 2021 WL 5494685 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 23, 2021).
    • Co-lead counsel in successful defense of the largest U.S. military services contractor in complex multidistrict tort litigation. After 800+ plaintiffs filed suit in 42 states alleging injuries from exposure to burn pit emissions during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, obtained complete dismissal of all claims, which was affirmed on appeal. See In re KBR, Inc., Burn Pit Litigation, 893 F.3d 241 (4th Cir. 2018).
    • Lead counsel for major defense contractor in $20-plus million CDA claim against the government. Litigated matter before Court of Federal Claims and settled the case at more than 99 percent of value after extensive negotiations with the Department of Justice.
    • Represented defense contractor in $50-plus million claim against the government. Member of trial team for 5-week bench trial before Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, which resulted in complete victory for contractor.
    • Counsel for major defense contractor in complex, high-stakes environmental insurance coverage litigation.
    • Successfully defended defense contractor in several design-defect tort suits arising out of alleged radiation exposure resulting from federal government’s use of gamma radiation and x-ray scanning equipment at border patrol checkpoints. See Martinez v. Science Applications International Corp., 2015 WL 11109381, Case No. B-10-207 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 1, 2015).

    • Represented Fortune 100 contractor in wrongful death suit arising out of military fighter jet crash during training operation.
    • Defended the largest U.S. military services contractor in a multimillion dollar personal injury suit arising out of the performance of maintenance services at Camp Fallujah during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Following limited discovery, the district court granted a pre-answer motion to dismiss and dismissed all claims based on both the political question doctrine and federal preemption, which was affirmed on appeal. See Taylor v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 658 F.3d 402 (4th Cir. 2011).
    • Defended a medical device manufacturer in an enforcement action brought by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration under the agency’s Quality System Regulation. Following 14 months of litigation and a bench trial in federal district court, the court dismissed all claims asserted by the agency, resulting in a complete victory for the manufacturer. See United States v. Utah Medical Prods., Inc., 404 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (D. Utah 2005).
    • On behalf of a Fortune 500 company, established jurisdiction in the United States over a foreign entity in an international arbitration award enforcement action under the New York Convention. The case involved an arbitration award valued at well over $100 million. See Telcordia Tech, Inc. v. Telkom SA Ltd, 458 F.3d 172 (3d Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1206, No. 06-663, 2007 WL 506053 (U.S. Feb. 20, 2007).

    Areas of Expertise

  • Credentials
    Education
    • The George Washington University Law School, J.D., 2003
        • cum laude
        • Moot Court Board
        • Trial Court Board
        • National Trial Court
    • Princeton University, A.B., 2000
    Bar Admissions
    • District of Columbia
    • New York
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    • U.S. Court of Federal Claims
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
    • U.S. District Court, District of Maryland
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    Pro Bono
    • Represented tenants’ association in landlord-tenant dispute involving hardship petition and negotiated favorable settlement.
    • Argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in appeal of removal order in asylum matter.
    • Obtained social security income benefits for individual claimant, including a retroactive award of benefits dating back more than a decade. This action included two appeals of adverse agency decisions to federal district court, both of which successfully resulted in reversal and remand to the agency and ultimately a favorable decision.
    Accolades
    • Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll (2011, 2014)
    • Klepper Prize for Volunteer Excellence, Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia (2015)

    Areas of Expertise

News and Insights

Events