Patent Infringement Litigation/Information Technology and Electrical

• MedioStream v. Microsoft Corporation, et al., 11-02525 RS (N.D. Cal.).  Represented Microsoft in this patent infringement case relating to multimedia technology.
• Acqis LLC v Appro International, Inc. et al., 6:09cv148 (E.D. Tex.).  Represented Hewlett-Packard in this patent infringement case concerning computer blade servers.
• Nomadix, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et al., 09cv8441 (C.D. Cal.).  Represented Hewlett-Packard in this patent infringement case that relates to network gateway devices.
• Lochner Technologies LLC v. Dell Inc., et al. 2:09cv177 (E.D. Tex.).  Represented Hewlett-Packard in this patent infringement case involving modular computer systems.
• Black Hills Media, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al, 2:13cv379 (E.D. Tex.) and Certain Digital Media Devices, Including Televisions, Blu-Ray Disc Players, Home Theater Systems, Tablets and Mobile Phones, Components Thereof and Associated Software, 337-TA-882 (USITC).  Represented Samsung in this nine-patent district court litigation and related ITC Section 337 investigation involving mobile phones, tablets, televisions, Blu-Ray players and home theater systems.
• Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., 1:12cv1598 (D. Del.).  Represented Samsung in this patent infringement suit brought by Arendi involving computer programs.
• NovelPoint Tracking LLC v. Samsung Electronics America Inc., 2:12cv747 (E.D. Tex.).  Represented Samsung in this patent infringement suit brought by NovelPoint involving GPS technology.
• Advanced Micro Devices v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 3:08-CV-0986-SI (N.D. Cal.).  Represented Samsung in this patent infringement case involving semiconductor circuitry and fabrication.
• Saxon Innovations Corp. v. Nokia, et al., 6:07-CV-490-LED (E.D. Tex.).  Represented Samsung in this patent infringement case involving electronic circuitry.
• Barry W. Thomas v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., 3:05-CV-510-K, (W.D. N.C.).  Represented Samsung in this patent infringement case involving cellular telephones.
• Seagate Technology LLC v. STEC, Inc., 5:08-CV-01950 JW (HRL) (N.D. Cal.).  Represented Seagate in this patent infringement case involving solid state drives.
• ISCO International, Inc. v. Conductus, Inc. and Superconductor Technologies, Inc., C.A. No. 04-487 (GMS)(D. Del).  Represented Superconductor Technologies in this patent infringement case involving cryogenically-cooled receivers used in mobile radio systems.
• Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. Litigation, 2:07-ml-01816-RGK-FFM (D. Del.).  Represented Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing in this multidistrict patent infringement litigation against nearly 100 defendants involving interactive telephone, computer telephony and related services.
• IDT Corporation v. Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., 04-00208 WJM-RJH (D. N.J.).  Represented Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing in this patent infringement litigation concerning prepaid card products and services.
• In the Matter of Certain Programmable Logic Devices And Products Containing Same, ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-453.  Represented Altera in this investigation involving patents concerning programmable logic devices.
• Centillion Data Systems Inc. v. MCI WorldCom Inc., et al., IP98-C-1754 (S.D. Ind.).  Represented MCI WorldCom in this case involving two billing system software patents.
• ActivCard S.A. v. VASCO Data Security International, Inc., C.A. No. 02-189 (MPT) (D. Del.).  Represented ActivCard in this patent infringement case involving authentication and encryption technology.
• Harris Corporation v. Atmel Corporation, 98-98-A (E.D. Va.).  Represented Atmel in this patent infringement action.  The eight patents in suit relate to semiconductor circuits and processing technologies.
• Atmel Corporation v. Agere Systems, Inc., C-03-04632 JCS (N.D. Cal.).  Represented Atmel in this patent infringement case involving digital signal processing chips.
• Atmel Corporation v. ISD, C95-01987 SC (JL) (N.D. Cal.).  Represented Atmel in this patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation action involving the use of semiconductors in voice recording devices.
• Atmel Corporation v. SST, C96-00039 SC (N.D. Cal.).  Represented Atmel in this patent infringement action.  The patents relate to circuits and memory cell designs for flash memory and EEPROMs.
• In the Matter of Certain EPROM, EEPROM, Flash Memory and Flash Microcontroller Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing Same; ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-395.  Represented Atmel in this patent infringement action involving semiconductor circuitry and processing.

Patent Infringement Litigation/Life Sciences

• Depomed, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, C02-0336 WHA (N.D. Cal.) and Depomed, Inc. v. IVAX Corporation, et al., 06-0100-CRB (N.D. Cal.).  Represented Depomed in these patent infringement cases involving oral drug delivery systems.
• Affymetrix, Inc. v. Multilyte, Ltd., C03-3779 WHA (N.D. Cal.).  Represented Multilyte in this patent infringement case involving microarray technology.
• BioGenex v. BioTek Solutions, C96-20151 EAI (N.D. Cal.).  Represented BioTek Solutions in this patent infringement action involving a method for restoring the antigenicity of formalin-fixed tissue, used in connection with cancer and other tests.

Trade Secret and Copyright Litigation

• Silvaco Data Systems v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et al., 1-05-CV-053615 (Super. Ct., Santa Clara County).  Represented Hewlett-Packard in this trade secret case involving electronic design automation (EDA) technology.
• Atari Games Corporation and Tengen, Inc. v. Nintendo of America Inc. and Nintendo Co., Ltd., C-89-4805 FMS, C-89-0027 FMS, [Consolidated] (N.D. Cal.).  Represented Atari Games in this litigation involving three home video game patents, trademarks and the copyright protection of computer software.  Obtained the first published appellate decision holding that a computer program may be copied in order to analyze its functionality.  Implemented reverse engineering and "clean room" procedures to develop alternative computer code.
• Performix v. Mercury Interactive Corporation, 95-1150 (E.D. Va.).  Represented Mercury Interactive in this copyright and trade secret litigation concerning automated software testing tools.
• Roland Corporation v. DREAM, et al., CV-96-6455 (C.D. Cal.).  Represented defendants in this copyright infringement action involving musical tones generated by an electronic musical instrument.
• American Dental Association v. Delta Dental Plan of California, C93-3700-CAL ENE (N.D. Cal.).  Represented Delta Dental in this case involving a claim of copyright infringement concerning the Code of Dental Procedures and Nomenclature published by the ADA.