This website uses cookies. For more information please contact us or consult our privacy policy.

Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.

We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.

This page has been added to your binder.

Matthew Kudzin
Matthew Kudzin
Associate
Washington +1 202 662 5990 mkudzin@cov.com Download V-card

Matthew Kudzin is an associate in the Washington, DC office. He is a member of the Litigation and Intellectual Property practice groups. Before joining the firm, Mr. Kudzin was a research fellow in the Mathematics Department of SUNY Stony Brook, where his work focused on the geometry and topology of spaces with large symmetry groups.

Litigation

  • Defending Eli Lilly and Company, Imclone LLC, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company in patent litigation related to Erbitux®, a monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of various cancers. The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania v. Eli Lilly and Company et al., No. 15-cv-6133 (E.D. Pa.).
  • Defending Elbit Systems in patent litigation related to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in both the Court of Federal Claims and the Federal Circuit. Thales Visionix, Inc. v. United States, No. 14-cv-513 (Fed. Cl.).
  • Represented Purdue Pharma L.P. and Transcept Pharmaceuticals at trial in Hatch-Waxman patent litigation related to Intermezzo®, a drug for the treatment of middle-of-the-night insomnia. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC et al., No. 12-cv-5311 (D.N.J.).
  • Represented Microsoft in patent litigation related to video transcoding technology. MedioStream v. Microsoft Corp., et al., No. 11-02525 RS (N.D. Cal.).
  • Represented Hewlett-Packard in patent litigation related to computer networking devices. Nomadix, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et al., No. 09-cv-8441 (C.D. Cal.).
  • Represented Out RAGE in patent, trademark, and false advertising litigation related to bowhunting equipment. Out RAGE, LLC v. New Archery Products Corp., No. 3:11-cv-701-BBC (W.D. Wisc.).
  • Represented comScore in two patent infringement cases involving technology related to media measurement and analytics. comScore, Inc. v. The Nielsen Company (US), LLC, et al., No. 1:11-cv-290-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va.) and The Nielsen Company v. comScore, Inc., No. 2:11-cv-00168-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va.).

Patent Office Trials

  • Representing Eli Lilly and Company as petitioner in an IPR proceeding challenging the validity of a patent owned by the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. The PTAB instituted trial on all challenged claims.
  • Representing of Huawei as petitioner in four inter partes review proceedings on data transfer interface technologies. 

ITC Section 337 Matters

  • Representing Samsung in patent infringement case related to noise cancellation technology. In re Certain Audio Processing Hardware, Software, and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1026.
  • Represented Samsung and other respondents in patent infringement trial related to flash memory chips. In re Certain MLC Flash Memory Devices and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-683.

Pro Bono

  • Representing a California state prisoner in the appeal of his federal habeas petition before the Ninth Circuit.
  • Represented DC prisoners in their parole hearings before the United States Parole Commission.

Previous Experience

  • NSF VIGRE fellowship, SUNY Stony Brook (2002-2005)
  • Washington DC Super Lawyers, Intellectual Property "Rising Star" (2014-2016)