Our Website Uses Cookies 

We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.

For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.

Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.

We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.

This page has been added to your binder.

Covington Secures Victory for Amarin Against FDA

May 29, 2015

WASHINGTON, DC, May 29, 2015 — Covington scored a victory for Amarin Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited this week when a federal judge vacated the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s earlier decision that Amarin’s new drug Vascepa was not entitled to a five-year period of market exclusivity. It is the first known successful challenge to FDA’s denial of five-year-exclusivity to a drug maker since the Hatch-Waxman Act was passed in 1984.
“The [c]court concludes that the FDA’s decision must be set aside,” U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss of the District of Columbia wrote in a 40-page opinion. 

On July 26, 2012, FDA approved Amarin’s new drug application for Vascepa, a prescription medicine used along with a low-fat and low-cholesterol diet to lower high levels of triglycerides in adults. On Feb. 21, 2014, however, the agency concluded that the drug is not entitled to five-year exclusivity because Vascepa’s active ingredient—a single molecule—is one component of a mixture that makes up the “active ingredient” of another FDA-approved drug. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, a drug manufacturer is entitled to five-year exclusivity if its newly-approved drug does not contain an “active ingredient” that was previously approved in another drug application.
Judge Moss ruled that “FDA’s ‘active moiety’ approach cannot be reconciled with the statutory text.” Granting Amarin’s motion for summary judgment, Judge Moss ruled that FDA’s administrative decision denying Amarin’s request for exclusivity failed under Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council. That case, decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1984, set forth the legal test for determining whether to grant deference to a government agency's interpretation of a statute which it administers.
Judge Moss remanded the case to the FDA for proceedings consistent with the opinion.

The Covington team included Christopher Sipes, Benjamin Block and Bradley Ervin.


Share this article: