Our Website Uses Cookies 


We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.


For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.

Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.

We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.

This page has been added to your binder.

Basel concession strengthens U.S. opposition to NSFR

November 27, 2017, Risk Magazine

Randy Benjenk is quoted by Risk Magazine in an article regarding the Basel Committee's concession that would allow national authorities to soften the treatment of derivatives liabilities in the net stable funding ratio (NSFR).

“Gross derivatives liabilities is not a very good proxy for a bank’s potential future funding needs for its derivatives portfolio,” says Benjenk. “The question is: is the number the US agencies come out with – assuming they come out with one lower than 20% – low enough to smooth over feelings about the gross derivatives liabilities metric?” The decision on the derivatives liabilities add-on could form a test case for the new Administration’s willingness to move away from the Obama era practice of going beyond international standards, he says. “If the EU came out with a number above 5% and the U.S. agencies matched the EU, it would be harder to accuse the U.S. agencies of gold-plating the international standard," says Benjenk.

 

Share this article: