This website uses cookies. For more information please contact us or consult our privacy policy.
Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.
We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.
This page has been added to your binder.
- Home
- Professionals
- Peter D. Camesasca
Peter D. Camesasca is a partner in the Covington’s Brussels and London offices, with broad experience in all major aspects of EU and national competition law.
Dr. Camesasca specializes in complex competitor interactions, advising on M&A and JV activities (specialization, R&D, joint development, etc.), as well as various informal types of competitor cooperation. He counsels clients on Article 101 exposure ranging from pure information exchanges to cartel-like allegations, having represented or still representing clients in the majority of the European Commission's recent cartel investigations, including Heat Stabilizers, DRAM, SRAM, Calcium Carbide, Air Cargo, Freight Forwarders, TFT-LCD (1&2), Smart Cards, Power Cables, Car Parts, Liner Shipping, Capacitors, and various still confidential matters. Dr. Camesasca also coordinates the defenses in numerous related damages claims before national courts.
Dr. Camesasca further specializes in the antitrust angle in IP-related matters, in particular the issues raised by standardization, standard-essential patents, injunctions, the approach vis-à-vis non-practicing entities, etc. During a two-year stint as special counsel to Samsung Electronics, Dr. Camesasca was materially responsible for handling the EU investigation which resulted in a path-breaking settlement covering the availability of injunctions, with no finding of wrongdoing by Samsung Electronics.
Dr. Camesasca has acted before the European Commission, the European courts, the German Bundeskartellamt, the UK Office of Fair Trading, the Belgian Competition Council, and various national courts.
In Chambers, he is noted for his "keen attention to detail and effective representation of clients' interests,” as being “very hands-on, fast and responsive” and "very forthright in stating his opinion and he is well connected in DG Comp.” Chambers further notes his experience in Korea, with sources stating that he is one of the “first-choice competition lawyers to clients in Korea.” GCR records that Dr. Camesasca is “the top choice for all technology-related competition law issues,” that he receives praise as “a very approachable practitioner with great communication skills,” and is particularly “experienced handling merger control and cartel cases.” He is regularly listed in the leading rankings.
- Representing Samsung Electronics in the EU settlement relating to the enforcement by Samsung of standard essential patents (“SEPs”) in connection with the 3G standard used in smartphones and tablets. The EU settlement closed the investigation against Samsung without a finding of infringement or fine levied against Samsung.
- Samsung Electronics in the EU investigation into TFT-LCD (1&2). Lead counsel to Samsung Electronics concerning all aspects of the European investigation into alleged collusion in TFT-LCD.
- Representing Samsung Electronics in the Smart Card Chips cartel investigation in the EU.
- Representing Samsung Electronics relating to various civil follow on claims.
- Representing Hapag-Lloyd and United Arab Shipping Company regarding the Container Shipping investigation in the EU.
- Representing a half dozen liner shipping carriers regarding various aspects of EU competition law (covering alliances and cooperation type agreements).
- Representing World Liner Data and Container Trade Statistics regarding all EU aspects of their data gathering/dissemination activities.
- Representing Samsung Electronics relating to various distribution related matters (EU and national).
- Representing Samsung Electronics relating to various IP related matters (EU and national).
- Representing Samsung Electronics relating to various transactional matters in the EU.
- Representing a major U.S. freight forwarder in the European Commission’s investigation into alleged collusion in Freight Forwarding.
- Samsung Electronics in the European investigation into DRAM. Served as lead counsel to Samsung Electronics, concerning all aspects of the EU investigation into alleged collusion in DRAM (settled as part of the first settlement under EU competition law, 2010).
- Truvo Netherlands/European Directories. Lead counsel to Truvo (formerly known as World Directories), a major provider of directory services worldwide and publisher of the Gouden Gids (Yellow Pages) in the Netherlands, in the merger with European Directories. In a 2-to-1 merger, the Dutch Competition Authority provided clearance without remedies, based on detailed economic assessment (cleared 2008 and prevailed in subsequent appeals).
- European Liner Affairs Association, grouping the world’s 21 leading liner shipping companies, in the EU Review of the Conference Block Exemption and the Consortia Block Exemption (2003-2009). Following abolition of the aforementioned Conference Block Exemption after an unprecedented five-year regulatory review, achieved a replacement regime in the form of the EC Maritime Guidelines, which formed the basis for the information exchange aspects subsequently covered in the EC Horizontal Guidelines.
- Honeywell v. Commission and GE v. Commission. Acted as counsel to Rockwell Collins, a major avionics manufacturer, concerning its interventions in the landmark appeals before the European General Court against the European Commission's GE/Honeywell decision, in what is generally considered a turning point in EC merger control. Supported the Commission's position in both cases and won (2005).
July 24, 2017, Covington Alert
On Friday July 21, 2017 the UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) handed down its second class certification decision under the class actions regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (the “Act”). It dismissed the application for two reasons. First, the proposed representative failed to show that it could reasonably estimate damages in the ...
April 7, 2017, Covington Alert
The UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal (the “CAT”) has handed down its first class certification judgment in relation to the class actions regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (the “Act”). The result? The hearing has been adjourned, with the proposed representative allowed to file and serve an amended Claim Form and revised expert evidence, if so ...
July 13, 2016, Covington Alert
On July 1, 2016, the German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy published a proposed draft amendment to the German Act against Restraints of Competition, which would introduce a new merger control notification threshold based on transaction value. The draft (i) introduces a new merger control notification threshold based on transaction value, (ii) ...
Courts face long-term Brexit questions
July 5, 2016, CDR News
Peter Camesasca and Alex Leitch are quoted in a CDR article regarding the long-term effects of Brexit on the courts, including uncertainties over enforcement. According to Camesasca, “This will not be immediate. Companies are not making any immediate decisions about litigation in the wake of the Brexit vote. Most are in ‘wait and see’ mode.” He continues, “But ...
An interview with Peter Camesasca
March 31, 2016, Global Competition Review
Peter Camesasca discusses private cartel actions in the European Union in this interview with GCR.
September-October 2015, CDR News
Brussels-based partner Peter Camesasca offers insight on how lawyers are advising claimants and defendants on the new UK class action regime in an article featured in the CDR News September-October 2015 issue. Camesasca says, “What we clearly do see is that there are a number of law firms who are touting this new regime very aggressively…these firms are seeing ...
September 24, 2015, Covington Alert
July 20, 2015, Covington Alert
The New UK Class Action Scheme: Rising Tides and Flood Defenses
July 17, 2015, Webinar
Court upholds Commission’s global reach on cartels
July 16, 2015, Politico
Quoting Peter Camesasca regarding the Innolux judgment.
July 9, 2015, Global Competition Review
Quoting Peter Camesasca regarding the Innolux judgment.
June 23, 2015, Covington Alert
June 11, 2015
BRUSSELS, June 11, 2015 — Covington has received 20 leading practice group rankings in the 2015 editions of Chambers Europe and Legal 500 EMEA. The legal guides have recognised the firm’s expertise in the following areas: CHAMBERS EUROPE Europe-wide - Regulatory - Agro/Food Europe-wide - Regulatory - Environment Europe-wide - Regulatory - ...
May 6, 2015, Covington E-Alert
Covington Honored at GCR Awards 2015
April 20, 2015
WASHINGTON, DC, April 20, 2015 — Global Competition Review has selected matters led by Covington lawyers as winners of two 2015 GCR Awards. Litigation of the Year, Cartel Defense was awarded for the defendants’ win in Motorola Mobility v AU Optronics, et al. Covington partners Robert Wick and Derek Ludwin in Washington, DC, and Jeffrey Davidson in San ...
April 20, 2015, Global Competition Review
Germany raises the standard for class action funding
February 25, 2015, Global Competition Review
Covington'sPeter Camesasca is quoted regarding a Düsseldorf court confirming that the funding model used by Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) in its case against cement cartelists is illegal. "Peter Camesasca, at Covington & Burling in Brussels, says while the ruling is good news for defendants in that it makes group actions in Germany more difficult, it goes against ...
December 22, 2014
WASHINGTON, December 22, 2014 — The Global Competition Review (GCR) has named Covington & Burling to its Global Elite, a list of the top 20 competition practices worldwide, ranking it among the top practices in both Brussels and Washington, D.C. Each year, GCR undertakes extensive analysis of competition law groups in 50 jurisdictions around the world. In ...
Judgment of the General Court of the EU in case T-272/12 - EU powers of inspection get another boost
December 1, 2014, Covington E-Alert
November 25, 2014, Covington E-Alert
Covington’s Brussels harvest
September 22, 2014, Commercial Dispute Resolution
Covington's Peter Camesasca, Johan Ysewyn, Melissa Van Schoorisse, Jennifer Boudet, Miranda Cole, Henriette Tielemans, Sebastian Vos, and Jean De Ruyt are mentioned in this article on the growth of Covington's Brussels office: "April was a busy month for Covington & Burling’s competition lawyers, marking, as it did, the welcome return of Peter Camesasca – who ...
Price signalling in container shipping
September 18, 2014, IBC’s Competition Law in the Shipping Sector 2014
Tell Me All About It: A Harder Line Is Being Taken on Information Exchanges and Price Signaling
July 8, 2014, Competition Law Insight
Information exchange and price signaling
May 7, 2014, IBC’s 8th Competition Economics Conference
One lateral hire and one return for Covington
April 30, 2014, GCR
Covington partners Peter Camesasca and Johan Ysewyn are featured in the articles above regarding their move to the firm's Brussels office.
New Considerations in Intellectual Property - Antitrust and Negotiating Standard Essential Patents
February 7, 2014, GCR Live 3rd Annual Antitrust Law Leaders Forum
Leniency: what is total co-operation? How to?
December 5, 2013, Premier Cercle Competition Summit 2013
Economics of patent pools and FRAND: what are relevant economic theories behind patent disputes such as smart phone wars
April 25, 2013, IBC’s 7th Competition Economics Conference
IP/antitrust interface
April 16, 2013, IBC’s 22nd Advanced EC Competition Law Conference
IPRs and antitrust – what is the proper relationship?
March 14, 2013, GCR Live 2nd Annual Law Leaders Asia-Pacific
2013, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice
July 2013, Journal of Competition Law & Economics
January 2013, Journal of Competition
What limits, if any, does EU competition law impose on the seeking of injunctions by FRAND encumbered SEP holders?
November 13, 2012, GCR Live 4th Annual Conference 2012
October-December 2012, MLex Ab Extra, Issue 11
Private actions: maximizing defense strategies
July 3, 2012, IBC’s Competition Litigation 2012
July 2012, Journal of Competition
May 4, 2012, Legal Times
What went well -- and not so well -- in the Commission’s cartel enforcement
March 21, 2012, IBC’s 5th annual forum, Cartel Risks & Compliance 2012
Defending cartels in regulatory investigations” and “Use of economics in cartels
March 20, 2012, IBC’s 6th annual forum, Competition Economics 2012
March 19, 2012
LONDON, 19 March, 2012 — Covington & Burling LLP received 46 individual mentions and 20 practice mentions in the Chambers Global 2012 edition. The guidebook, which ranks lawyers globally by pan-regional and country practice area, is designed to identify the most skilled legal practitioners based on the qualities most valued by clients. The Covington lawyers ...
EU competition law -- latest developments in the Commission's enforcement practice
July 6, 2011, Korea Judicial Research and Training Institute
A View from Private Practice on EU Anti-Cartel Enforcement
June 9, 2011, Korea Fair Competition Federation
Covington Adds Four Partner Life Sciences Corporate Team
5/16/2011
LONDON, May 16, 2011 — Covington & Burling LLP adds a top life sciences corporate team to its London office, further enhancing its comprehensive global life sciences practice. Covington is pleased to announce that Paul Claydon, Natalie Diep, James Gubbins and James Halstead are joining Covington & Burling LLP as partners. They complement Covington’s highly ...
A View From Private Practice on EU Competition Law
May 4, 2011, Korean Fair Trade Commission's Anti-Cartel Education Program for Korean Business
Settlements: What Have We Learned from the Commission’s First Cases? and Leniency and Settlement: Is Cooperation Becoming Less Attractive?
March 29, 2011, IBC Legal’s 4th annual forum, Cartel Risks & Compliance 2011
February 10, 2011, Covington E-Alert
2011, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice
Competition law and international agreements -- anything new? The example of the EU-South Korea FTA
December 10, 2010, Global Competition Law Centre
EU Competition Law and Cartel Enforcement
October 29, 2010, Mont-Blanc Circle Retreat
Avoiding Cartel Risks and Gaining Leniency
October 14, 2010, C5's Managing Competition Risk & Compliance
Beyond Bananas -- The Law and Economics of Information Exchanges Under EU Competition Law
May 27, 2010, IBC's Advanced Review of Competition Economics
The Banana Cartel and Information Exchanges Under EU Competition Law
April 22, 2010, ACLE's Information, Communication and Competition
Settlements Under EU Competition Law
March 25, 2010, IBC's Cartel Risks and Compliance 2010
2010, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice
2009, European Competition Law Review
2009, GCR Asia-Pacific Antitrust Review
September 13, 2008, Lloyd's List
2008, Antitrust Bulletin
2008, Global Competition Policy
January 1, 2008, Antitrust Law Journal
2006, European Competition Law Review
2005, European Antitrust Review
2004, Tijdschrift voor Belgisch Handelsrecht
2004, Current Developments in European Integration
January 1, 2004, European Antitrust Review
2003, De Belgische Mededingingswet Anno
Het Groenboek Over De Herziening Van De Controle Op Concentraties: Efficiëntievoordelen Herbekeken
2002, Markt en Mededinging
2002, Antitrust Bulletin
2001, Intersentia: Antwerpen-Groningen
2001, Ökonomische Analyse des Arbeitsrechts
2000, European Competition Law Review
2000, European Law Review
1999, Tijdschrift voor Europees en Economisch Recht
1999, NEI: Rotterdam
1999, European Competition Law Review
1998, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb
- JUVE, Brussels (2015-2016)
- Global Competition Review, 40 Under 40 (2012)
- Chambers Global, Competition/European Law (Belgium) (2011-2012, 2016-2018)
- Chambers Europe, Competition/European Law (2017-2018)
- Shortlisted for “Lawyer of the Year - Under 40” by GCR Awards 2011
- Legal 500 EMEA, Competition: Belgium (2015-2017), Healthcare and Life Sciences (2017) and EU Regulatory - Information Technology (2015-2016)