Our Website Uses Cookies 


We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.


For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.

Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.

We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.

This page has been added to your binder.

NY Ruling Undercuts SEC Disgorgement Coverage

October 26, 2018, Law360

Mitchell Dolin is quoted in Law360 regarding a New York appeals court decision which applied

the U.S. Supreme Court's Kokesh decision to rule that part of Bear Stearns' settlement with the SEC is a penalty, and therefore not covered by insurance.

 

Mr. Dolin said the appellate decision contravenes Bear Stearns’ reasonable expectations about what its policies would cover. He emphasized that the SEC itself took the position in Kokesh that disgorgement is not a penalty, to avoid application of the five-year limitations period. He says, “The rules of policy construction call for a court to interpret exclusionary language strictly and to interpret all policy language through the lens of what reasonable parties would have understood. The parties would not have reasonably understood that monetary relief the SEC itself declined to recognize or label as a penalty would be construed as such for insurance purposes.”

Share this article: