Our Website Uses Cookies 


We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.


For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.

Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.

We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.

This page has been added to your binder.

Allentown Indictment A Warning To Attys Seeking Gov't Work

July 31, 2017, Law360

Arlo Devlin-Brown is quoted in a Law360 article regarding the complications surrounding political contributions for lawyers working with the public sector following the indictment of Allentown Mayor Ed Pawlowski. According to Devlin-Brown, "The Supreme Court has indicated that in the context of campaign contributions, compared to other benefits that go to politicians, there has to be a very clear understanding between those making donations and politicians that donations are expressly in exchange for particular official acts." He adds, "It's fine to make contributions to particular elected officials because you think these elected officials will be supportive of efforts to pitch your firm on the merits for government contracts. But you can't cross the line and make a donation to a politician who suggests that such a donation is a necessary or even sufficient step for winning the contract. If a politician on the other side makes that suggestion, a law firm, or any other vendor, would be wise to turn away and head in the other direction."

Share this article: