Our Website Uses Cookies 

We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.

For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.

Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.

We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.

This page has been added to your binder.

Expert Testimony Not Helping IP Owners Avoid AIA Review

March 8, 2017, Law360

Scott Kamholz is quoted in a Law360 article regarding the impact of allowing patent owners to present expert testimony in their responses to America Invents Act review petitions. According to Kamholz, “Generally speaking, if the patent owner's witness is just contradicting the petitioner’s witness ... then the [Patent Trial and Appeal Board] would tend to order trial because that difference of opinion demonstrates the existence of a genuine issue of material fact.” He adds, “It’s very much a weighing of a lot of factors. If you put an expert declaration in, it may just signal to the board that what we really need here is a trial."

Share this article: