Subscribe

  • How Can We Help You?

    Global Problem Solving from Covington: Deal with Complex Problems Anywhere in the World

Kudzin_Matthew_1000x714_ENV

Matthew Kudzin

Of Counsel

Washington +1 202 662 5990

  • About
  • Representative Matters
  • Credentials
  • About

    Matthew Kudzin is of counsel in the Washington, DC office. He is a member of the Litigation and Intellectual Property practice groups. Before joining the firm, Matthew was a research fellow in the Mathematics Department of SUNY Stony Brook, where his work focused on the geometry and topology of spaces with large symmetry groups.

    Areas of Expertise

  • Practices and Industries
  • Representative Matters

    Litigation

    • Defending Eli Lilly and Company, Imclone LLC, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company in patent litigation related to Erbitux®, a monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of various cancers. The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania v. Eli Lilly and Company et al., No. 15-cv-6133 (E.D. Pa.).
    • Defending Elbit Systems in patent litigation related to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in both the Court of Federal Claims and the Federal Circuit. Thales Visionix, Inc. v. United States, No. 14-cv-513 (Fed. Cl.).
    • Represented Purdue Pharma L.P. and Transcept Pharmaceuticals at trial in Hatch-Waxman patent litigation related to Intermezzo®, a drug for the treatment of middle-of-the-night insomnia. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC et al., No. 12-cv-5311 (D.N.J.).
    • Represented Microsoft in patent litigation related to video transcoding technology. MedioStream v. Microsoft Corp., et al., No. 11-02525 RS (N.D. Cal.).

    • Represented Hewlett-Packard in patent litigation related to computer networking devices. Nomadix, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et al., No. 09-cv-8441 (C.D. Cal.).
    • Represented Out RAGE in patent, trademark, and false advertising litigation related to bowhunting equipment. Out RAGE, LLC v. New Archery Products Corp., No. 3:11-cv-701-BBC (W.D. Wisc.).
    • Represented comScore in two patent infringement cases involving technology related to media measurement and analytics. comScore, Inc. v. The Nielsen Company (US), LLC, et al., No. 1:11-cv-290-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va.) and The Nielsen Company v. comScore, Inc., No. 2:11-cv-00168-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va.).

    Patent Office Trials

    • Representing Eli Lilly and Company as petitioner in an IPR proceeding challenging the validity of a patent owned by the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. The PTAB instituted trial on all challenged claims.

    ITC Section 337 Matters

    • Representing Samsung in patent infringement case related to noise cancellation technology. In re Certain Audio Processing Hardware, Software, and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1026.
    • Represented Samsung and other respondents in patent infringement trial related to flash memory chips. In re Certain MLC Flash Memory Devices and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-683.

    Areas of Expertise

  • Credentials
    Education
    • University of Pennsylvania Law School, J.D., 2008
        • Penn Law Review, Technology Editor
    • Indiana University, Ph.D/M.S., 2002
        • Ph.D. in Mathematics
        • M.S. in Computer Science
    Bar Admissions
    • District of Columbia
    • New York
    Judicial Clerkship
    • Hon. Jerome A. Holmes, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    Pro Bono
    • Representing a California state prisoner in the appeal of his federal habeas petition before the Ninth Circuit.
    • Represented DC prisoners in their parole hearings before the United States Parole Commission.
    Accolades
    • Washington DC Super Lawyers, Intellectual Property "Rising Star" (2014-2016)
    Previous Experience
    • NSF VIGRE fellowship, SUNY Stony Brook (2002-2005)

    Areas of Expertise

News and Insights

Events