Our Website Uses Cookies
We and the third parties that provide content, functionality, or business services on our website may use cookies to collect information about your browsing activities in order to provide you with more relevant content and promotional materials, on and off the website, and help us understand your interests and improve the website.
For more information, please contact us or consult our Privacy Notice.
Your binder contains too many pages, the maximum is 40.
We are unable to add this page to your binder, please try again later.
This page has been added to your binder.
CDRH: 510(k)s and Science in Regulatory Decision-Making
November 2010, Journal of Medical Device Regulation
Does FDARA Open the Door to Third-Party Reviews of Implantable Devices? Lawyer Discusses
September 29, 2017, Regulatory Focus
Scott Danzis is quoted in a Regulatory Focus article regarding the allowance of third-party reviews under the FDA Reauthorization Act. “While the revised statute does allow for implantable, life sustaining, or life supporting devices to be eligible for third party review, we expect that FDA will be cautious in adding such devices to that program," Danzis says. ...
Life Sciences Group Of The Year: Covington & Burling
February 10, 2017, Law360
Law360 selected Covington’s Life Sciences practice as a “Practice Group of the Year,” highlighting the firm’s involvement in billion-dollar transactions, success in contentious litigation, and regulatory advice on cutting-edge technology. According to Michael Labson, “What we offer and bring to complicated, complex issues is a mixture of deep subject-matter ...
January 17, 2017, Covington Alert
On January 13, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) released a discussion paper synthesizing public feedback on FDA’s 2014 draft guidance documents and outlining a possible approach to regulation of laboratory developed tests (LDTs) (Discussion Paper). This approach is intended to “advance the public discussion by providing a possible ...